Energy Management Practices
1. Fertiliser Sector
Various aspects of energy conservation are as under:
- Certification / declared policies with regard to energy efficiency,
quality and environment.
- Company’s commitment to energy management
- Energy management cell – organisation and functionality
- Activities undertaken by the company to promote energy management
- Budget for energy conservation and investment decisions.
- Role of industry association and peer group
- Barriers to implementation of energy conservation measures
- Government policies and sectoral policies
- Energy management policy.
1.1 Energy Management Cell (EMC)
In majority of the fertilizer plants, the equivalent organizational
setup is in the form of ‘Technical Services (TS)’ department that
performs the duties of a typical EMC. The TS departments also perform
the role of troubleshoorting, preventive and predictive maintenance,
plant/process modifications etc. Mostly these departments are cross-functional
in nature and consist of multidisciplinary team of professionals.
The key personnel of this department frequently meet frequently
the top management and discuss the enrgy related issues. As reported
by the sample plants, major job responsibilities of the EMC consists
of :
- Identification of energy conservation projects
- Execution of energy conservation projects in the plant
- Continuous monitoring of energy performance of plant and equipment
- Prepare energy consumption status report for review by different
levels of management.
- Interact (formally and informally) with different departments
in the plant and motivate them to conserve energy
Second important thing that is required to improve the performance
of the EMC is to make budgetary commitment for energy management
at corporate level. It is inferred that having a separate budget
for energy conservation will certainly show more commitment from
top management towards energy management in the plant.
1.2 Promotion of energy management
In majority of plants top management takes the decision on energy
management. All the plants set energy conservation targets to improve
energy efficiency. Most commonly used basis for setting up the energy
conservation target is previous year’s energy consumption. However,
some new generation plants also use best international figures for
same feedstock and fuel to set their energy conservation targets.
In the fertilizer industry, the targets are usually expressed in
terms of specific energy consumption and energy conservation targets
are also specified in terms of proposed reduction in specific energy
consumption figures. Few industries also use both the best energy
conservation figures in fertilizer sector using same feedstock and
fuel and the best operating practices among group plants as basis
for setting their energy conservation targets.
With regard to energy consumption norms, it is difficult to give
one single energy consumption norm for the fertilizer plants as
these norms are expected to vary significantly with technology,
fuel and feedstock used in the plants. The units have their own
designed / guaranteed specific energy consumption that invariably
becomes their energy consumption norm. Moreover, majority of old
plants have revamped/retrofitted their process to reduce energy
consumption and productivity.
1.3 Capacity utilization and energy consumption of Indian Ammonia
plants
| Feedstock |
Capacity utilisation (%) |
Energy Gcal/MT |
| Gas |
96.4 |
9.48 |
| Naphtha |
80.3 |
11.73 |
| Gas + Naphtha |
90.5 |
10.27 |
| Fuel oil |
91.2 |
13.90 |
| Gas + Naphtha + fuel oil |
90.6 |
10.94 |
| Coal |
22.5 |
42.69 |
| Gas + Naphtha + fuel oil + coal |
86.6 |
11.43 |
1.4 Employee motivation and education
One of the most important factors to promote energy management
at unit level is to develop and encourage the human resources to
contribute to the process of energy management and energy efficiency.
This ensures a correct mix of top down and bottom up approaches
to bring about energy conservation. Motivation and education of
employee forms a very important part of development of human resources
for the industry. Most common practice to educate the employees
is by organising focused training programs. Majority of units conduct
in-house training programs on energy efficiency and energy conservation.
This reflects that majority plants have developed in-house technological
capacity in energy efficiency aspects. Through internal training
programs the knowledge is exchanged within the organisation and
capacity building takes place. In addition to internal training
programs, most of the plants also encourage their employees to take
part in external training programs.
Other activities through the industry encourages motivation of
its employees for energy conservation is through participatory suggestion
schemes and slogans. It has been proven that participation in incentive
based suggestion scheme results in generation of new and innovative
ideas to reduce energy consumption and improve productivity. The
suggestion scheme, wherein all levels of workforce participants,
is very crucial for generating incremental innovation to bring down
energy consumption. The cumulative effect of small measures to conserve
energy can be very significant. All the plants have a suggestion
scheme in place to promote energy conservation. Majority of plants
also promotes energy conservation by encouraging employees to provide
slogans on energy conservation. The suggestion and slogan schemes
are also followed by small financial incentives that encourage the
staff to participate in these programs.
With regard to publishing of information / case studies on energy
conservation, most plants encourage their employees to publish actively
in the internal newsletter, and discuss the achievements in internal
seminars. However, the extent of participation in external journals
/ publications was low. It is important to mention that the training
budget is overall budget and it includes all aspects of human resource
development programs. In most fertilizer plants, energy management
aspect is usually built into training related to process, automation
and control, and other production and maintenance related aspects.
However, there are some training programs specific to energy management.
1.5 Budget for energy conservation
In majority of fertilizer plants, project approval and budgetary
allocation for large projects is done on case to case basis. In
the fertilizer sectors having a separate budget for energy conservation
represents a proactive approach by the plants to encourage implementation
of energy efficiency projects.
1.6 Role of industry association and peer group
Fertilizer industry presents a good example of openness and cooperation
among industries. Information exchange with industry association
and peer group industries takes place by sharing information through
plant visits. Sharing of case studies and accessing and sharing
technical information through industry associations such as FAI
are important means of exchange of information among plants.
Majority of fertilizer industry considers the role of industry
association very crucial in providing information about energy management.
Fertilizer association plays an important role in the dissemination
of information about energy conservation by organising industry
meet / seminars on energy management. The association also helps
the industry by providing information about energy conservation
opportunities and by providing technological database on energy
efficiency. Few plants also expressed that the industry association
helps in providing national / international benchmarks for energy
consumption.
1.7 Barriers for implementation of energy conservation options
First high cost of technology / energy efficient equipment is
the main barrier to adoption of energy conservation measures in
the plants.
2. Proposed energy management policies in fertilizer industry
2.1 Role of top management
In order to secure commitment from the shop floor, it is imperative
for top management to demonstrate its commitment to promote energy
management and energy conservation at corporate level. Strong and
focused leadership is crucial for carrying forward an integrated
energy management plan that includes all levels of management and
entire shop floor.
Since energy forms a large part of the costs of production, all
the plants realize the importance of role of top management and
rate it as a crucial parameter that must be stressed while making
corporate / plant level energy management policies.
2.2 Setting up energy management cell
“Since energy is everybody’s business, therefore it is nobody’s
business”, this is the attitude that is usually visible in organizations
that do not have clear guidelines on energy conservation and management
structure to support implementation of energy management programs.
Having an organizational set up that rests energy management as
a core responsibility of a group/functional unit is central to achieving
energy management goals at corporate / plant level. EMC is expected
to coordinate with all the departments within the plant to identify,
develop and execute energy management projects. Its responsibilities
are cross functional and headed by a full time energy manager. Therefore,
setting up EMC is another main area that must be stressed in corporate
energy management policies. Although majority of fertilizer units
has technical services / engineering departments that routinely
carry out main functions of a typical EMC, having a separate EMC
would certainly give focus and objectivity to the energy management
activities in the plant.
2.3 Energy Audit
Third most important aspect i.e. energy audit help in identifying
the possible areas of energy conservation along with techno-economic
analysis to enable implementation. Energy management policy must
emphasize the role of other energy audits as a tool to identify
major energy consuming areas and improve energy efficiency.
2.4 Monitoring and targeting
Monitoring and targeting of key energy parameters help the industry
to benchmark and compare its own performance over the years. The
industries can also compare their energy performance with other
industries nationally and internationally.
2.5 Internal energy award system and ushering a culture of preventive
and predictive maintenance
In order to motivate the staff to participate actively in energy
management exercise, an incentive / reward scheme should complement
participatory approach involving group activities. Majority of the
plants feels that a system of rewards acts as a catalyst to motivate
employees to provide suggestion and schemes to reduce energy conservation.
“Prevention is better than cure” – this is certainly true for the
plant and equipment. Better maintained plant and equipment not only
save on loss of production but also help in minimizing energy consumption
in plant and equipment. Therefore, preventive and predictive maintenance
schedule should be emphasized in company’s energy management policy.
2.6 Energy Management Information System (EMIS)
Like any typical MIS, objective of EMIS is to enable different
levels of management to review and monitor the energy consumption.
With the help of EMIS systems, energy consumption status reports
can be generated for suiting the needs of different levels of management.
2.7 Training and Capacity building
Development of human capacity is very crucial to generate new
and innovative ideas in-house for promoting energy management. It
is important that companies develop specific training modules related
to energy efficiency and management as part of its HRD training
policy. This can be done by encouraging the plant to participate
in both internal and external training programs on energy management
and energy conservation.
In addition the staff should be encouraged to publish achievements
in energy management in
both internal and external publications. Similarly, personnel can
also participate in relevant
national and international conferences to exchanges ideas on relevant
subjects. Industry
associations can play a crucial role in these cases.
Reference:Energy Management Policy – Guidelines for Energy Intensive
Industry in India, Chapter 5, pp 66-95 by Bureau of Energy Efficiency
|